Reply by Richard 1 hour ago
Are you actually being sued on this case ?
▶ Reply
Permalink Reply by roger epperson 1 hour ago

Guess he spoke too soon.  The question was posed to him on the RR auction lawsuit. 

The very lawsuit that Roger has been bragging about not having to honor his LIFETIME guarantee on.  The one where he says.."RR has to honor it, not me"

Roger in his "White Hat" bragging about not having to honor his guarantee...

Michael Johnson has added Roger to list of people being sued

You can read about that here: Roger Epperson Lawsuit


Case details will be coming later on this month, NOV 2014. (Now April/May 2015) Until more on this case is printed, the emails between Roger and the man filing the lawsuit can be seen on Roger Epperson's emails

UPDATE: Roger's case is going forward.  He has until May 1 2015 at the close of business to pay $50,000 to settle his case, as per Texas Law.  If he does not settle the case, it will go to the next level, where Michael Johnson will be granted at least 3 times the damages, and AUTOMATIC court costs and lawyer fee's.  That is part of the 2nd step in the courts in Texas. (this is AUTOMATIC, and there is nothing Roger can do about not having to pay the fees)

More can be seen on the updated website, where you can read about Roger being charged with Deceptive Trade Practices and Breach of contract: Deceptive Trade Practices, Breach of contract

Roger is willing to buy the item back at the selling price of 10 grand, while stating he will not admit to the item being fake/forged. He also is saying he did not sell the other items in question to Michael Johnson. (He should probably re-read his emails that he sent where he tells Mr. Johnson that he has bought more from him in the past with no problems, now all of a sudden, in classic Michael Frost fashion, he's "forgot" and "didn't sell him any")

The other items in queston are:

A Fake/forged Paul Mccartney signed hofner bass

A fake/forged Jimmy Page signed guitar

A fake/forged Led Zeppelin album with 2 signatures

A fake/forged Led Zeppelin album with 2 signatures

The above items are the ones Roger denies selling, and has asked for proof of sale.

You need to be a member of Autograph Planet to add comments!

Join Autograph Planet

Email me when people reply –


  • I don't know man?
    I went back and read the email exchange and it seems ths Laura Rosenberg took great care to secure a correct answer regarding who performed the examination, she was rather specific.

    Have we determined if the Grad sig is live ink?
    Should we have an expert examine it? Or a jury?
  • as far as the grad view, I'll go out on a limb - he never reviewed it.  Rather, someone at PSA/DNA did and Did Laura Rosenberg make a statement that was untruthful...   Nope, she will claim, imo, that she was mistaken and misinformed in issuing her email.  

  • we may never know as neither of us were there.  It's easy to cherry pick items in order to prejudice the matter or try and conduct some sort of trial in the world of "public opinion" grant.  Just like the claim from the johnson camp that indicates "the johnson camp was informed by EBAY, that Epperson's COA's are now banned".   Totally false but you don't find those exchanges visible, do we?

    Needless to say rampant claims, innuendos, & misinterpretations of what people read is why social media and pop up lawsuit sites need to be taken with a grain of salt and not the gospel according to...since they don't present the complete picture (imo)

  • To be fair to Roger, I believe Grad screwed this authentication up. 

  • I like the Laura Rosenberg email as an example of legible, easily understood communication. It is very clear, easy to understand, and seemingly straightforward:

    "Hi Mike-

    Yes, Steve Grad examined your item and signed the letter; although there may have been other authenticators who examined it as well.

    Let me know if you need anything else.


  • "You offered the full price for this album by lance in south africa and you declined to sell it to him as you told him you would rather sue me instead."

    Now if 'were' were not meant to be a part of this statement then does it mean that Johnson was offering full price and then going to utilize a South African Man as a courier for the funds?

    Then, he withdrew from those negotiations and decided to sue?


  • This all isn't going to be resolved on an autograph forum. The parties involved, I'm am sure, each believe in what they stand for.

  • I added the "were" and now it seems to make more sense. It seems Johnson was stating that he'd prefer to use the United States Court system for seeking possible compensation rather than pass a questionable item on to Lance. 

    This is assuming that DB is correct that the word "were" was somehow forgotten.

  • Did Mr. Johnson decline that sale to "Lance" after he was told the item wouldn't pass PSA authentication?

    Why would he sell it knowing that? was he expected to sell it then?

    I dont get it?

  • add a "were" (just a hunch) between the "you offered" portion and it makes complete sense.

    Now, why wouldn't someone say, "no can do, as I have a rejection letter from PSA/DNA" rather than what is stated?    "I have the emails from you (Johnson implied) to him (lance)."

    As I said before emails taken out of context, speculation & tainted views only add fuel to the fire.

This reply was deleted.